g52.
This summary draws especially on Bataille (1967), The Accursed Share, vol 1, pp 19–77, and on James G. Frazer (1922), The Golden Bough, chapters 24–26. This is a controversial field, and Frazer’s work is now dated, though not refuted. Peter Metcalf and Richard Huntington (1981) write, “It was Frazer’s simplistic view that every representation suggesting regicide inevitably meant the former existence of the practice. Evans-Pritchard’s view reverses the practice, stressing the power of the idea itself, and stressing that the belief may be even more effective in strengthening the polity when the deed is not actually done.” Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, p 180. Of course, the substitution of a son opened the way for someone else to stand in for the son. As Bataille (1967) writes, “There is no possibility of a mistake here: This was a sacrifice of substitution” (p 55).